Magyarab

Från Rilpedia

Version från den 14 maj 2009 kl. 06.10 av MagnusA (Diskussion)
(skillnad) ← Äldre version | Nuvarande version (skillnad) | Nyare version → (skillnad)
Hoppa till: navigering, sök
Wikipedia_letter_w.pngTexten från svenska WikipediaWikipedialogo_12pt.gif
rpsv.header.diskuteraikon2.gif
icon_anmal.gif
rp-wp-sv.gif

Innehåll

Petters robot

{{Spoiler}} och {{Spoiler slut}} enl. beslut på sffr.

  • Diskussion:

Ser bra ut, ska roboten användas till något annat när det här är klart? /Grillo 13 januari 2009 kl. 18.27 (CET)

Nej, inte vad jag kan komma på. Några förslag? :-) --Petter 13 januari 2009 kl. 18.32 (CET)

Nu har den gjort 50 testredigeringar. Med den här takten kommer det att ta drygt 45 dagar. :-) --Petter 13 januari 2009 kl. 18.45 (CET)

Petters robot har nu bot-status. MiCkE 13 januari 2009 kl. 18.49 (CET)
Tack! Petter 13 januari 2009 kl. 18.51 (CET)

FriskoBot

  • Diskussion:

Boten har nu över 50 redigeringar (blev ett par fler). /Frisko (dis.) (bid.) 19 januari 2009 kl. 15.26 (CET)

Ser bra ut, FriskoBot har nu botstatus. Ztaffanb 20 januari 2009 kl. 09.16 (CET)

Homobot

  • Discussion:

Please run som more tests. Sten A 10 oktober 2008 kl. 19.55 (CEST)

Please let us know when you have about 50 edits. MiCkE 6 november 2008 kl. 09.26 (CET)
Your bot's edits are so few and far in between, so I don't see the reason for giving it a flag. MiCkE 12 december 2008 kl. 18.13 (CET)

Application closed due to lack of interest (and edits) of applicant. Njaelkies Lea (d) 21 januari 2009 kl. 19.19 (CET)

DSisyphBot

  • Discussion:

Hello and happy new year, i will do ~50 edits this day. --Sisyph 6 januari 2009 kl. 13.31 (CET)

Global bots was recently enabled on svwiki, for iw-bots it is recommended that you apply for this instead which will enable you to run your bot on many different wikipedias, including svwiki. If you still would like to have local bot status on svwiki, please indicate so, or this application will be considered closed. Njaelkies Lea (d) 21 januari 2009 kl. 19.04 (CET)
Ok, so you can close this bot flag request, I will ask global bot status later. --Sisyph 23 januari 2009 kl. 11.19 (CET)
Sounds good, I do apologize for the slow handling of your application. Should you want local bot status at a later time you are welcome to reapply. Njaelkies Lea (d) 23 januari 2009 kl. 11.33 (CET)

Jotterbot

  • Discussion:

50 edits completed. Can some one verify and grant the bot flag?--Jyothis 9 december 2008 kl. 13.58 (CET)

Edits seem fine, I think flag can be granted. MiCkE 12 december 2008 kl. 18.16 (CET)

Your bot appears to have global bot status [2] which recently was enabled on svwp, hence there should be no need to continue with this application. Njaelkies Lea (d) 21 januari 2009 kl. 18.41 (CET)

If my information on your global status is in error, and/or you still wish to pursue local bot status, please indicate so or this application will be considered closed. Njaelkies Lea (d) 21 januari 2009 kl. 19.34 (CET)

Thanks. I applied for global bot status after this request. unfortunately, this request stayed longer than the meta wiki one. Anyways, as you suggested, this can be closed. --Jyothis 21 januari 2009 kl. 23.48 (CET)

Sounds good! I do apologize for the long time required to handle your request. Njaelkies Lea (d) 23 januari 2009 kl. 11.42 (CET)

CarsracBot

  • Discussion:

I have a global bot status, so technically I don't need a local botflag. It is more that I will indicate that I start also do botedits here. Carsrac 24 januari 2009 kl. 20.13 (CET)

You are very welcome to svwiki! As you write, with global bot status there is no need for local bot status for running an iw-bot so I am closing this application. Njaelkies Lea (d) 25 januari 2009 kl. 15.26 (CET)

PoxBot

  • Diskussion:
Redigeringarna så här långt ser bra ut och ägaren är känd, föreslår att botstatus tilldelas. Njaelkies Lea (d) 24 januari 2009 kl. 12.39 (CET)
Instämmer. Rättigheter tilldelade. / LawD 25 januari 2009 kl. 16.06 (CET)

Xqbot

  • Discussion:

You indicate that you have global bot status, I fail to verify this but if you do, note that global bots have been enabled on svwiki. Please indicate if you still wish to pursue your application for local bot status. Njaelkies Lea (d) 21 januari 2009 kl. 19.08 (CET)

I see now your edits are already marked as bot edits so your bot has global status. Do you still wish to apply for local status? Njaelkies Lea (d) 21 januari 2009 kl. 21.17 (CET)
If it's not needed for these two funktions, I will run it with global bot flag. Thanks --Xqt 22 januari 2009 kl. 11.04 (CET)
I will leave this application open for one week to give people the time to object, but I don't have objections. Your edits look fine anyway so maybe one of the bureaucrats will pop by to flag you. Njaelkies Lea (d) 23 januari 2009 kl. 11.31 (CET)

As no one have objected I conclude there are no objections and close this application. Thank you for your edits to svwiki! Njaelkies Lea (d) 31 januari 2009 kl. 22.16 (CET)

GnawnBot

  • Discussion:

I don't know how these iw-bots work and it might not be your bots fault, but why remove fr:Santour here? It seems to me the link was accurate. Njaelkies Lea (d) 11 november 2008 kl. 10.53 (CET)

I manually worked on this one and tentatively removed this link. Interwiki links were severely complicated because it all came down to "santur" and "santour". All were done according to the title. StormDaebak 12 november 2008 kl. 15.55 (CET)
It wont happen in the autonomous mode, which I will user primarily.StormDaebak 28 november 2008 kl. 05.33 (CET)
Vad säger vi om det här, någon som vill tillstyrka? MiCkE 12 december 2008 kl. 18.14 (CET)
Well, a lot of the edits go to kowiki, which maeks it a bit hard to check them, but from what I could tell, it all seemed OK, except what Njaelkies Lea brought up.

This edit doesn't look right. Before the edit the iw to da was right and now it's wrong.--Kruosio 30 december 2008 kl. 16.28 (CET)

Your bot appears to have global bot status [3] which recently was enabled on svwp, hence there should be no need to continue with this application. Njaelkies Lea (d) 21 januari 2009 kl. 18.41 (CET)

If my information on your global status is in error, and/or you still wish to pursue local bot status, please indicate so or this application will be considered closed. Njaelkies Lea (d) 21 januari 2009 kl. 19.34 (CET)
I will close this now as I have not received a response and as I see no reason for you to have a local flag. Welcome to svwiki and happy editing! Njaelkies Lea (d) 1 februari 2009 kl. 20.33 (CET)

XZeroBot

  • Discussion:

Global bots was recently enabled on svwiki, for iw-bots it is recommended that you apply for this instead which will enable you to run your bot on many different wikipedias, including svwiki. If you still would like to have local bot status on svwiki, please indicate so, or this application will be considered closed. Njaelkies Lea (d) 21 januari 2009 kl. 19.02 (CET)

Also, your edits are very few, if you intend to edit at this rate you may continue without bot status. If you do however want to pursue your application we will want to see at least 50 edits. Njaelkies Lea (d) 21 januari 2009 kl. 21.21 (CET)
I will do some test edits with my bot, so my bot will have much more edits. And I think, I will request a local botflag on svwiki first. --Xxxx00 23 januari 2009 kl. 14.16 (CET)
Sounds good, let us know when you have 50 edits. Njaelkies Lea (d) 23 januari 2009 kl. 14.31 (CET)
The 50 test edits of my bot are ready --Xxxx00 31 januari 2009 kl. 16.19 (CET)
I can't find any problems with your test edits so I recommend bot status be given to your bot. (you'll have to wait for a second opinion) Njaelkies Lea (d) 31 januari 2009 kl. 22.24 (CET)
Pictogram voting keep-green.svg Utfört Since I can't find any problems either, I've now granted you Bot status. /Sten A 1 februari 2009 kl. 20.43 (CET)

Rubinbot

  • Bot framework: pywikipedia
  • Function summary: Interwiki
  • Discussion:

I do want to get a local flag instead of requesting global bot flag, cause I think it's a bit early for me to request it successfully. Rubin16 1 februari 2009 kl. 20.09 (CET)

Sounds good. Please proceed to test your bot and make at least 50 edits. Kind regards, Njaelkies Lea (d) 1 februari 2009 kl. 20.40 (CET)
Sorry for delay, I haven't noticed it... I am starting trial now. Rubin16 5 februari 2009 kl. 10.02 (CET)
~50 edits made, but still workin. I can stop it if needed. Rubin16 8 februari 2009 kl. 12.15 (CET)
You can continue as long as you don't go too fast before you have a bot flag (your current rate is no problem at all). As far as I can see your edits look fine, if one of the bureaucrats think so too you should have your flag soon. Njaelkies Lea (d) 8 februari 2009 kl. 13.22 (CET)
Bot flag granted. Ztaffanb 9 februari 2009 kl. 10.05 (CET)

Peti610bot

  • Discussion:
Edits seem ok, I think flag can be granted. MiCkE 12 december 2008 kl. 18.20 (CET)

Global bots was recently enabled on svwiki, for iw-bots it is recommended that you apply for this instead which will enable you to run your bot on many different wikipedias, including svwiki. If you still would like to have local bot status on svwiki, please indicate so, or this application will be considered closed. Njaelkies Lea (d) 21 januari 2009 kl. 18.58 (CET)

Användaren svarar vare sig här heller på sin användarsida på hemwikin, men redigeringarna fortsätter, vad göra? Redigeringarna borde kunna vara många nog för att ansöka om globalt konto. Njaelkies Lea (d) 1 februari 2009 kl. 20.29 (CET)
Flag has been granted. MiCkE 11 februari 2009 kl. 17.25 (CET)
Jag har flaggat, går ju bra att ansöka om global botstatus ändå och redigeringarna ser ju ok ut. MiCkE 11 februari 2009 kl. 17.25 (CET)

GhalyBot

  • Discussion:

Hello Ghaly! Most of your edits look great, but a few are a bit odd, I found these two now: [4] [5] Would you like to make a comment on this? Also, for iw-bots we recommend applying for global bot status, which would enable you to run your bot on svwiki and many others, have you considered doing this? Apparently your bot account may be too young for global bot status. Njaelkies Lea (d) 31 januari 2009 kl. 22.12 (CET)

Den här roboten verkar vara så ny (två veckor gammal) att den inte uppfyller kravet "already be active on several wikis, with long-term contributions to back up its trustworthiness" för att få global robotstatus. /81.231.250.110 31 januari 2009 kl. 22.28 (CET)
Det glömde jag kolla upp, men du hade gärna fått skriva det på engelska så ansökaren hade förstått. Njaelkies Lea (d) 31 januari 2009 kl. 22.34 (CET)
Har du fått någon respons på de konstiga redigeringarna ovan? /Sten A 1 februari 2009 kl. 20.48 (CET)
Nej, har bara frågat här dock. Njaelkies Lea (d) 1 februari 2009 kl. 20.52 (CET)
    • Many thans for your comment , the mistake with 1974 was because when a manuale error I started the article on 1974 on arz the interwiki was to 1972. The same happened with 1939 when I started the article on arz. The bot saw that and made the changes , in a way the bot was acting correctly but the edit on the arz was not. Many thanks .
    • I will be trying in the future, to get the global status once I get more approval for the bot , it now has bot flag on 8 wikipedias.--Ghaly 2 februari 2009 kl. 21.32 (CET)
I am happy with your explanation, everyone makes mistakes, please be careful though. You will have to wait for a second opinion before bot status can be handed out. Njaelkies Lea (d) 3 februari 2009 kl. 13.17 (CET)
  • Thanks , the bot now has flags on 9 wikipedias and I hope you will approve it here as well.--Ghaly 3 februari 2009 kl. 15.08 (CET)
Flag has been granted. MiCkE 11 februari 2009 kl. 17.26 (CET)

RibotBOT

  • Discussion:
Pictogram voting keep-green.svg Utfört RibotBOT now have robot status. / Sten A 23 februari 2009 kl. 22.12 (CET)

LucienBOT

  • Discussion:

Hello Lucien! I was wondering why you do not apply for global bot status? With all your edits I'd assume you should have a good chance getting it? Njaelkies Lea (d) 4 mars 2009 kl. 13.44 (CET)

Contributions so far looks good as far as I have seen. I think, since the bot is quite new, the more local bot flags it gets the better are the chances for getting a global bot status. Local bot flags does not hurt (at least if the bot behaves). --MagnusA 4 mars 2009 kl. 13.51 (CET)
Pictogram voting keep-green.svg Utfört MiCkE 4 mars 2009 kl. 14.03 (CET)
Amazing how much faster this all works now.. Njaelkies Lea (d) 4 mars 2009 kl. 14.03 (CET)

NobelBot

  • Programming language: Python (pywikipedia framework)
  • List of bot flags on other wikipedias: en, bs, fr... (bot flags on other wikis)
  • Contributions: contributions on ar wp
  • Purpose: Interwiki
  • Technical details (optional): (on -autonomous mode)
  • Discussion:
Edits are very few, please run som more tests and let us know when you have about 50 edits. / LawD 30 december 2008 kl. 16.43 (CET)
The account NobelBot (diskussion • bidrag • loggar från • loggar om • globalt konto • hantera rättigheter) seems not to exist? /NH 18 januari 2009 kl. 20.47 (CET)

Global bots was recently enabled on svwiki, for iw-bots it is recommended that you apply for this instead which will enable you to run your bot on many different wikipedias, including svwiki. If you still would like to have local bot status on svwiki, please indicate so, or this application will be considered closed. Njaelkies Lea (d) 21 januari 2009 kl. 19.01 (CET)

Jag får inget svar här och inte på användarens hemwiki heller, och jag kan fortfarande inte se någon redigering. Avsluta ansökan? Njaelkies Lea (d) 1 februari 2009 kl. 20.38 (CET)
Avslutar ärendet p.g.a inaktivitet. /Sten A 1 februari 2009 kl. 20.52 (CET)
(en: closed due to inactivity) Njaelkies Lea (d) 3 februari 2009 kl. 13.23 (CET)

Hi, I'create an account, why the bureaucrat didn't grants the Bot flag ?NobelBot 15 mars 2009 kl. 07.25 (CET)

The bot operator refuses to re-apply and refers to its first, archived, application [6] so I restored its application for reconsideration and added the template with various "quick links" for the bot. --MagnusA 17 mars 2009 kl. 09.12 (CET)

Your talk page at arwp seems to have been deleted recently. Is that talk page the best way to get in contact with you, if needed, or what is the best way to get in contact? I mean, blocking the bot is a quite rude way to get in contact and should normally only be done in an emergency... Also, many of the contributions are in the User namespace. I think it might be dangerous to edit user pages in autonomous (unattened) mode, especially if you are using with the -hint or -same options. The other contributions looks goods as far as I can see. I do not understand arabic though... --MagnusA 17 mars 2009 kl. 10.30 (CET)
Användaren verkar anse att det här med bottar är det bara vara att anmäla sig för och sedan glömma bort. :/ Undrar om vi inte borde blockera botten tills att vi får svar, eller helt enkelt tacka nej. Skummelt också det här med att användarsidan är raderad, men å andra sidan fick man ju i alla fall aldrig något svar där heller. Njaelkies Lea (d) 18 mars 2009 kl. 23.55 (CET)
Jo eftersom det inte går att få kontakt med ägaren bör nog boten blockeras. Vi kan inte bot-operatörer som är okontaktbara. MiCkE 19 mars 2009 kl. 08.28 (CET)
NobelBot verkar onekligen ha en del att lära om bothyfs. Boten blev nyligen uppmärksammed på enwp för "careless driving" även om det verkade lösa sig genom att blockera (för att få operatören att reagera?). Synd att det skall behövas sådana metoder för få kontakt, men det finns väl ingen annan råd... --MagnusA 19 mars 2009 kl. 09.33 (CET)
Symbol declined.svg Declined. Hard to communicate with operator, careless editing in e.g. the User namespace. --MagnusA 19 mars 2009 kl. 09.49 (CET)

this my old page, i has been deleted because I' has been changed my name.جمال بركات 19 mars 2009 kl. 11.01 (CET)

Has been repaired the link of my home page. جمال بركات 22 mars 2009 kl. 15.11 (CET)

Following this discussion the request is reopened. MiCkE 22 mars 2009 kl. 16.10 (CET)

I think the contributions looks ok as far as I see. I cannot confirm the contents though, as most of the added links are to arwp and I cannot read arabic. To me the contributions look like standard interwiki. All contributions so far are the in main and Category namespaces as requested. It also looks like the operator now has an unbroken connection to an active user talk page (at arwp). It is pssible to reach it from the bot's user page via the operator's user page at svwp. --MagnusA 24 mars 2009 kl. 07.29 (CET)
Pictogram voting keep-green.svg Utfört Ok, I have given NobelBot, bot status. MiCkE 24 mars 2009 kl. 10.59 (CET)

Ojbot

{{coord}}-mallar.

Pictogram voting keep-green.svg Fixat! Sten A 17 april 2009 kl. 18.47 (CEST)
Man tackar! --Ojan 19 april 2009 kl. 12.05 (CEST)
  • Diskussion:

Obersachsebot

  • Discussion:
Contributions so far looks OK to me. +1 for making sure to put the interwiki link in the templates between the noinclude tags. Please hold on for opinions from more people. --MagnusA 1 maj 2009 kl. 20.18 (CEST)
Knowing about the noinclude-bug I check every interwikification in the template namespace within minutes after the bot edit. --Obersachsebot 1 maj 2009 kl. 21.12 (CEST)
Pictogram voting keep-green.svg Utfört Bot status granted. MiCkE 4 maj 2009 kl. 18.11 (CEST)
Tack! --Obersachse 4 maj 2009 kl. 19.44 (CEST)
Hämtad från "https://sv.rilpedia.org/wiki/Magyarab"
Personliga verktyg