Huspredikant

Från Rilpedia

Version från den 1 juni 2009 kl. 07.42 av Lavallen (Diskussion)
(skillnad) ← Äldre version | Nuvarande version (skillnad) | Nyare version → (skillnad)
Hoppa till: navigering, sök
Wikipedia_letter_w.pngTexten från svenska WikipediaWikipedialogo_12pt.gif
rpsv.header.diskuteraikon2.gif
icon_anmal.gif
rp-wp-sv.gif


Wiki-broom.svg Crystal Clear app help index.svg Wiki-newadmin.svg Gnome-system-run.svg Wiki-name.svg
Begäran om åtgärder Begäran om IP-koll Ansökan om administrativ behörighet Robotansökan Byte av användarnamn
Genvägar:
WP:BOB
WP:BOTS
WP:RA

Innehåll
Instruktioner på svenska finns på Rilpedia:Robotar.

This is the page where you ask for permission to run a bot on Swedish Wikipedia. Please observe:

  • Create a separate user account for your bot. We recommend that the name of your bot includes the word "bot" or other variations.
  • The template

{{bot|bot master's name|site=home site}} is required on the bot's user page.

  • The user page of the bot should include a description of the tasks it is doing.
  • Global bots are enabled on svwiki. If you intend to run an iw-bot, consider applying for global bot status instead at meta.

Post your entries at the top of the "New requests" section below and tell us what kind of bot it is (pywikipedia? your own construction?) and exactly what it will do. If your bot is an ordinary pywikipedia interwiki bot, you may start test-run immediately. If your bot is of another construction or is going to do something more complex, then wait a couple of days, if no one opposes, you can test-run your bot so the users at svwiki can see it in action. Either way, make sure at least one user who have seen your bot at work signs that they accept your bot. When the bot has been accepted it may get a bot flag from one of our bureaucrats.

Bots without a bot flag should wait at least 30 seconds between edits. Bots with a bot flag should wait about 10 seconds between edits. Administrators are encouraged to block bots that are harmful, run too fast or do somehing else than described in the application to run it.

Instruktioner / Instructions

Before application you have to:

  1. Put the mandatory template

{{bot|bot master's name|site=home site}} on the bot's user page.

  1. Describe the functions of the bot on its user page.

Please copy this form for your application. The title should be Your bot's name.

=== Name of Your Bot ===
* ''Bot's name:'' {{User|Name of Your Bot}}
* ''Bot master:'' ~~~~
* ''Bot status in other wikimedia projects/language versions:'' 
* ''Bot framework:'' e.g. pywikipedia
* ''Function summary:'' e.g. Interwiki

*'''Discussion:'''
----

Swedish speaking users, use this template / svensktalande användare kan använda denna mall istället. Ange din robots namn som rubrik

=== Namnet på din robot ===
* ''Robotens namn:'' {{User|Namnet på din robot}}
* ''Robotägare:'' ~~~~
* ''Robotstatus på andra wikimediaprojekt/språkupplagor:'' 
* ''Programtyp:'' t.ex. pywikipedia
* ''Uppgifter:'' t ex interwiki

*'''Diskussion:'''
----

This page is supervised by the sv bureaucrats who will handle your request.

Nya ansökningar/New requests

Innocent bot

  • Diskussion:

Då jag märkte att jag med den snabbare uppkopplingen (växeln är uppgraderad här på landet) idag kan göra redigeringar som ovan i hastigheten 3-5 redigeringar per minut kanske det är fördelaktigare om jag fick bot-status för den typen av arbete. Allt arbete sker alltså för hand, ofta med hjälp av snabba tanget- och musklick. Robotens namn ska ha anknytning till användaren namn enl instruktion. För att inte bli sammanblandad med LA2 väljer jag att bygga bot-namnet på mitt gamla anv-namn istället. -- Lavallen 1 juni 2009 kl. 09.42 (CEST)

D'ohBot

  1. Interwiki,
  2. fixing wiki syntax, for example, incorrect square brackets. I'm going to do this using pywikipedia. 
    python replace.py -fix:syntax -file:...
  3. unambiguously uncontroversial edits like this I've made in en-wiki.
  • Discussion:

Should interwiki bots also do a lot of other things? I think it will be harder to review bots if they mostly do interwiki links, but sometimes do other things. I noticed another iw-bot recently that makes lots of other changes unrelated to interwiki links. For example separating the defaultsorts from the categories by a blank line and moving Mall:LinkFA before the categories instead of before the interwiki-links. And who decides what is uncontroversial edits? For image replacements like in the given example we already have CommonsDelinker, which specifically has no bot flag. Is this the same kind of replacements? If so, why do we need another bot to do that? If not, are such replacements so many that we need a bot to do them? /90.229.132.159 26 maj 2009 kl. 23.27 (CEST)

All you mention here ("moving Mall:Mall:LinkFA" and separeting the defaultsorts from categories by a blank line") are doing in cosmetic_changes.py. By defalt, costemic changes is switched off

(See user-config.py:

cosmetic_changes = False
 
# If cosmetic changes are switched on, and you also have several accounts at
# projects where you're not familiar with the local conventions, you probably
# only want the bot to do cosmetic changes on your "home" wiki which you
# specified in config.mylang and config.family.
# If you want the bot to also do cosmetic changes when editing a page on a
# foreign wiki, set cosmetic_changes_mylang_only to False, but be careful!
cosmetic_changes_mylang_only = True

I have the following settings in my user-config.py

mylang = 'ru'
cosmetic_changes_mylang_only = True

It means that I don't make cosmetic changes here (in sv-wiki) -- NO inserting of blank lines and NO moving of LinkFA-template

Mainly, I need bot-flag for interwiki purpose. --Dnikitin 27 maj 2009 kl. 03.42 (CEST)

I mentioned items 2) and 3) in my Function summary just to warn that I likely will do some small uncontroversial changes. --Dnikitin 27 maj 2009 kl. 03.51 (CEST)
I don't see a problem with iw-bots doing other stuff as well, as long as they are mentioned in the application (as was done in this case). Go ahead and do ~50 edits and we will evaluate you bot's edits. MiCkE 27 maj 2009 kl. 11.41 (CEST)

Avklarade ansökningar / Completed requests

ObelixBot

  • Diskussion:

Den kör nu på. Jag stoppar vid 50. Obelix 22 maj 2009 kl. 13.01 (CEST)

Jag såg att redigeringskommentaren blev konstig men koden är fixad, men provredigeringarna är nu klara för granskning. Obelix 22 maj 2009 kl. 13.30 (CEST)
Pictogram voting keep-green.svg Utfört Editeringarna ser ok ut. Botstatus tilldelad. / LawD 23 maj 2009 kl. 00.09 (CEST)

MauritsBot

  • Bot's name: MauritsBot (diskussion • bidrag • loggar från • loggar om • globalt konto • hantera rättigheter)
  • Bot master: Maurits 21 maj 2009 kl. 12.11 (CEST)
  • Bot status in other wikimedia projects/language versions: nl, de, fr, it, es, en, pt, lb, da, sl, la.
  • Bot framework: pywikipedia
  • Function summary: Interwiki and cosmetic changes (the latter only in combination with the first). The bot starts from nl and from several smaller wiki's (e.g. nds-nl, fy, la, etc.).
  • Discussion:

Please start test run (around 50 edits). What cosmetic changes Does the interwiki.py script make, besides the interwiki link stuff? --MagnusA 21 maj 2009 kl. 14.48 (CEST)

BTW: Have you considered applying for global bot status? --MagnusA 21 maj 2009 kl. 14.53 (CEST)

The script makes the following extra changes:

  • standardize categories
  • cleanup links (for example: [[pagetitle|link]]name becomes [[pagetitle|linkname]] and [[pagetitle|pagetitle]] becomes [[pagetitle]])
  • cleanup section headers (for example: ==Title== becomes == Title ==)
  • translate and capitalize namespaces (for example: [[Kategori:title]] becomes [[Kategori:Title]] and [[Kategori:title]] becomes [[Kategori:Title]])
  • remove deprecated templates (if there are any)
  • resolve html-entities (translate &code; into it's proper understandable form)
  • valid Xhtml (for example, change <br> tot <br />)
  • remove useless spaces
  • hyphenate ISBN numbers

I have considered applying for global bot status, but the application of cosmetic changes is not listed there as an accepted option, so I'm not sure if I should. Indeed, it would be a lot easier though... I have started the test run. Kind regards, --Maurits 21 maj 2009 kl. 20.36 (CEST)

Pictogram voting keep-green.svg Utfört - test run complete, approximately 50 edits. --Maurits 21 maj 2009 kl. 23.23 (CEST)
As far as I can see, the edits look fine. / LawD 22 maj 2009 kl. 09.25 (CEST)
Pictogram voting keep-green.svg Utfört Bot status granted. --MagnusA 22 maj 2009 kl. 10.09 (CEST)
Thank you. --Maurits 22 maj 2009 kl. 10.40 (CEST)

BenzolBot

  • Discussion:
As far as I can tell, the contribs look fine. MiCkE 10 maj 2009 kl. 16.38 (CEST)
Pictogram voting keep-green.svg Utfört Bot status granted. --MagnusA 10 maj 2009 kl. 16.41 (CEST)

Arkiv

Det finns arkiv för denna sida.
Redigera inte arkivsidorna, starta istället en ny diskussion under en ny rubrik.
Hämtad från "https://sv.rilpedia.org/wiki/Huspredikant"
Personliga verktyg